Start with something familiar
Imagine preparing lunch for a club. The organizer predicts fifty guests, and thirty of those guests have already replied. You do not cook for eighty people unless the prediction explicitly excludes the replies. Yesterday’s six packed lunches that were promised but never delivered are a separate obligation. Food in a locked freezer is not ready to serve. The planning question is therefore about unique people, promises, and food that can actually reach the table on time.
Words to know: Net requirement, Backlog, Usable receipt.
Define the demand population
Northstar sells reusable bottles. A forecast is a statement about a population and period, not automatically an extra order. Label whether the forecast includes confirmed orders. If next week’s total forecast is 51 and confirmed orders of 20 are already within it, total next-week demand stays 51. A useful reconciliation is 20 confirmed plus 31 unconfirmed, with customer and date references where available.
Backlog is demand whose original due date has passed. In our case six overdue units are explicitly excluded from the 51. Add them once to obtain 57 units of demand to cover. When those six ship, close the backlog record. Do not also keep them as an open order in the current-week total. A clear definition prevents a neat spreadsheet from making an expensive false shortage.
Net only eligible supply
Usable opening stock is 18 bottles. Another ten arrive and pass inspection before the demand event. With no safety-stock target, additional supply is max of zero and 57 minus 28, which is 29. This is a requirement, not evidence that a supplier can deliver 29. Keep required quantity and confirmed feasible quantity in separate columns so a recommendation does not become an accidental promise.
Stock status matters as much as quantity. Damaged, quarantined, reserved, or location-inaccessible units may not be eligible. Every subtraction needs a reason that it can serve this demand. Use the same unit throughout; cases and bottles cannot be added without a conversion. If a purchase order changes from planned to confirmed, update its status instead of adding a second receipt record.
Make reconciliation visible
A planner should be able to trace each total back to unique records. Create columns for source identifier, original due date, required date, quantity, inclusion rule, and supply status. A simple control checks that confirmed demand plus residual forecast equals the intended total. Another checks that opening stock plus usable receipts minus fulfilled demand equals closing stock.
A negative projected balance is a shortage signal, not physical negative stock. You may keep signed balances in a planning view, but an execution view should show zero physical stock and a separate backlog. Choose one representation for calculations and explain the translation. Carrying a negative balance and adding the same backlog again in the next bucket counts the shortage twice.
- Define units and event
- Reconcile eligible inputs
- Apply the stated rule
- Check feasibility
- Explain the decision
Northstar worked decision
All quantities and costs below are fictional and self-contained. Apply the stated timing and unit conventions.
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Next-week total demand | 51 |
| Separate prior backlog | 6 |
| Usable opening stock | 18 |
| Receipt before demand | 10 |
- 1. Reconcile 20 confirmed + 31 residual forecast = 51.
- 2. Add separate backlog: 51 + 6 = 57.
- 3. Subtract eligible supply: 57 - 18 - 10 = 29.
Baseline net requirement is 29 bottles.
Assumptions
- Use only the quantities and timing stated; no hidden receipts, losses, or substitutions.
- Fractional mathematical results are rounded only where whole-unit or pack rules are explicitly stated.
Where this can fail: This is a transparent teaching model. Confirm calendars, data definitions, and operating constraints before using an analogous policy in practice.
Build, test and explain a plan
Use the example for week 1. Weeks 2–4 have new demand 40, 46, 38; scheduled receipts 12, 0, 20. Begin with 18 stock and six backlog. All receipts precede weekly demand, new planned receipts are unconstrained for this arithmetic exercise, and target closing stock is zero. Preserve a separate order identifier for each row. The eight-hour allocation is a self-paced estimate, not experimentally validated; it includes model building, scenario testing, a memo, and teach-back.
Use paper or a spreadsheet. The estimates below include the study and worked example already on this page.
| Estimated hours | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | Study the reading and make a one-page definition sheet. Mark every unit, date convention, and inclusion rule. Explain the difference between the policy input and the outcome being measured. |
| 0.5 | Recalculate the worked example independently, without copying the displayed result. Show intermediate arithmetic and reconcile the answer to the physical story. Note one assumption that could change the decision. |
| 3 | Build a reusable multi-period spreadsheet from the supplied lab data. Use the example for week 1. Weeks 2–4 have new demand 40, 46, 38; scheduled receipts 12, 0, 20. Begin with 18 stock and six backlog. All receipts precede weekly demand, new planned receipts are unconstrained for this arithmetic exercise, and target closing stock is zero. Preserve a separate order identifier for each row. Keep inputs separate from formulas, add a clear output table, and include a check column that flags any quantity or timing inconsistency. Walk through the first and last rows manually. |
| 2 | Create separate named scenario tabs. Build base case; quarantine three opening bottles; then change the data definition so week-1 total 51 includes backlog. Reconcile all four weeks in each case. Preserve the baseline and record both changed inputs and changed outputs. Explain any outcome that stays the same, since a binding constraint or a measurement rule can make an intervention ineffective. |
| 1 | Write a 400-word decision memo naming your recommended action, evidence, assumptions, responsible role, and next check. Compare at least two alternatives using your table. State one limitation that could reverse the recommendation and what additional evidence would resolve it. |
| 1 | Teach the result aloud in five minutes using an original diagram. Then review every formula, answer the module questions relevant to this lesson, and write a short correction log. Use the remaining time to reproduce the key calculation from a blank sheet. |
Your deliverables
- An auditable multi-period workbook with baseline and named stress cases.
- A decision memo with numerical evidence and explicit limitations.
- An original explanatory diagram and a correction log.
Check your practice work
- Baseline net requirement is 29 bottles.
- If three opening bottles are quarantined, net requirement rises to 32.
- If backlog is already included within 51, requirement is 23; never add six again.
- With zero target stock, baseline new planned receipts for weeks 1–4 are 29, 28, 46, 18; each week closes at zero.
- Quarantining three changes only week-1 planned receipt to 32. Including backlog within week-1 total changes only week-1 receipt to 23.
Keep these three ideas
- Reconcile forecast, orders, backlog, and usable supply before proposing a purchase.
- Keep the unit, timing, and denominator visible.
- Treat model outputs as conditional on their stated assumptions.
Common mistakes
- Changing an input definition without changing all affected formulas.
- Presenting an expected or proposed quantity as confirmed usable supply.
Optional video study
Reconcile forecast, orders, backlog, and usable supply before proposing a purchase.
- Define the demand population
- Net only eligible supply
- Make reconciliation visible
First half: foundation and first worked check.
Open the module media & quizPut this idea to use
Carry your assumptions into a practical tool, then compare your result with a short guide.
Open a related planning toolRead the related planning guidePractice with the planning gameThis saves a completion marker in this browser only. It does not verify time spent.